Browse by Tags

• 2005
• active/active
• active/passive
• analysis
• benchmarking
• best practice
• blogs
• clustered
• environment
• high availability
• monitoring
• parallel execution
• partition
• performance monitoring
• resources
• san
• scalability
• security
• sql server
• ssas
• ssis
• ssms

SQL Server Clustering - what is the difference between Active/Passive and Active/Active Clustering, which is good for better performance?
18 March 08 02:20 AM | SQL Master | 3 Comments   

First part of question is a pure newbie FAQ to know about, and the simple answer would be it is one of the Clustering type you can adopt within your SQL Server environment. To cover on newbie aspect both Active/Passive & Active/Active configuration Read More...

Filed under: performance, sql server, security, clustering, monitoring, partition, parallel execution, performance monitoring, 2005, active/active, active/passive, scalability

SQL Server 2005: Clustering FAQ is Active/Active a load balancing solution?
29 February 08 03:04 AM | SQL Master | 4 Comments   

Another FAQ within newsgroups & forums that will SQL Server Clustering supports load balancing? It is quite common for a newbie to say and look at Clustering configuration such as Active-Active where you have n+1 nodes as a serving instances, the Read More...

Filed under: performance, sql server, clustered, best practice, clustering, blogs, monitoring, environment, benchmarking, san

Whats the best way to setup memory on a four-node cluster?
06 September 07 02:42 AM | SQL Master | 3 Comments   

Though it is more to do with SQL Storage kind of question, I have just dragged into Performance tuning section for the sake of large installation you talk with clustering. For the sake of discussion it seems better to plan ahead for the failing instances Read More...

Filed under: ssms, high availability, performance, sql server, security, ssis, ssas, analysis, clustering, resources